Blog Details

#Article 5 Series 5 Must-Reads on the National Contract in Public Tenders in Romania

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”no” hundred_percent_height=”no” hundred_percent_height_scroll=”no” hundred_percent_height_center_content=”yes” equal_height_columns=”no” menu_anchor=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” status=”published” publish_date=”” class=”” id=”” link_color=”” link_hover_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” gradient_start_color=”” gradient_end_color=”” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”center center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” fade=”no” background_parallax=”none” enable_mobile=”no” parallax_speed=”0.3″ background_blend_mode=”none” video_mp4=”” video_webm=”” video_ogv=”” video_url=”” video_aspect_ratio=”16:9″ video_loop=”yes” video_mute=”yes” video_preview_image=”” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ spacing=”” center_content=”no” link=”” target=”_self” min_height=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” hover_type=”none” border_size=”0″ border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” border_radius=”” box_shadow=”no” dimension_box_shadow=”” box_shadow_blur=”0″ box_shadow_spread=”0″ box_shadow_color=”” box_shadow_style=”” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” background_type=”single” gradient_start_color=”” gradient_end_color=”” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_image_id=”” background_position=”left top” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend_mode=”none” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=”” filter_type=”regular” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″ last=”no”][fusion_imageframe image_id=”2761|full” max_width=”” style_type=”” blur=”” stylecolor=”” hover_type=”none” bordersize=”” bordercolor=”” borderradius=”” align=”none” lightbox=”no” gallery_id=”” lightbox_image=”” lightbox_image_id=”” alt=”” link=”” linktarget=”_self” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=”” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″]https://sirbuandvornicu.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/44.jpg[/fusion_imageframe][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container][fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”no” hundred_percent_height=”no” hundred_percent_height_scroll=”no” hundred_percent_height_center_content=”yes” equal_height_columns=”no” menu_anchor=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” status=”published” publish_date=”” class=”” id=”” link_color=”” link_hover_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”center center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” fade=”no” background_parallax=”none” enable_mobile=”no” parallax_speed=”0.3″ background_blend_mode=”none” video_mp4=”” video_webm=”” video_ogv=”” video_url=”” video_aspect_ratio=”16:9″ video_loop=”yes” video_mute=”yes” video_preview_image=”” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ layout=”1_1″ spacing=”” center_content=”no” link=”” target=”_self” min_height=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” hover_type=”none” border_size=”0″ border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” box_shadow=”no” box_shadow_blur=”0″ box_shadow_spread=”0″ box_shadow_color=”” box_shadow_style=”” background_type=”single” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_image_id=”” background_position=”left top” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend_mode=”none” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=”” filter_type=”regular” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″ last=”no”][fusion_separator style_type=”none” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” sep_color=”” top_margin=”20px” bottom_margin=”20px” border_size=”” icon=”” icon_size=”” icon_circle=”” icon_circle_color=”” width=”” alignment=”center” /][fusion_title title_type=”text” rotation_effect=”bounceIn” display_time=”1200″ highlight_effect=”circle” loop_animation=”off” highlight_width=”9″ highlight_top_margin=”0″ before_text=”” rotation_text=”” highlight_text=”” after_text=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” content_align=”left” size=”3″ font_size=”” animated_font_size=”” fusion_font_family_title_font=”” fusion_font_subset_title_font=”” fusion_font_variant_title_font=”” line_height=”” letter_spacing=”” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” margin_top_mobile=”” margin_bottom_mobile=”” text_color=”” animated_text_color=”” highlight_color=”” style_type=”none” sep_color=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]

Did Arbitration become the new rule in Public Procurement in Romania?

[/fusion_title][fusion_separator style_type=”none” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” sep_color=”” top_margin=”20px” bottom_margin=”20px” border_size=”” icon=”” icon_size=”” icon_circle=”” icon_circle_color=”” width=”” alignment=”center” /][fusion_text columns=”” column_min_width=”” column_spacing=”” rule_style=”default” rule_size=”” rule_color=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]

Did Arbitration become the new rule in Public Procurement in Romania? The 5th and last article of our Series 5 Must-Reads on the National Contract in Public Tenders on Romania is here! Check out the new rules established  by the National Contract for claims, dispute resolution and arbitration:

In our fifth and last article of our series 5 Must-Reads on the National Contract in Public Tenders in Romania we are analyzing the rules established for claims and dispute resolution/arbitration.

You can also learn more on the structure of the National Contract in comparison with FIDIC standards here , as well as on the main improvements and risks brought by the National Contract.

CONTENT:

In the first part of the article we are embarking into a brief analysis on the outcomes of the new arbitration rule set by the National Contract.

Following this, we will summarize the rich steps prescribed the National Contract from the formulation of a claim up until the parties may resort to arbitration.

As we will observe below, the procedure set by the National Contract is detailed and strict. Important consequences are set for cases when the terms are not observed. When one of the steps of the procedure is not followed, then the parties will no longer be entitled to resolve the dispute in arbitration.
Each step and term should be observed with attention and in detail.
Nonetheless, in comparison with the limitations imposed by the previous practice where mostly national courts had jurisdiction, the claims and dispute resolution rules brought by the National Contract represent a welcomed update in public procurement in Romania.

  1. Is the Arbitration rule a positive outcome?

The National Contract establishes within articles 69 and 70 a new procedure for the formulation of claims and their resolution through decisions of the Supervisor. This can eventually lead to an arbitration carried out by the rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania.

The procedure put in place by the National Contract includes a multitude of details. Very limiting deadlines must be met each step of the way prior to arbitration.

Failure to submit a notice or details- within the time frame- represents a reason for dismissal of the claim.

Prior to the enforcement of the National Contract, the conditions of contracts applicable in tenders in Romania established that all litigation in connection with or resulting from the contract are to be resolved by national competent court.
A very limited number of tenders established arbitration for dispute resolution.

Now, the National Contract put in place a procedure which maintains certain FIDIC related rules and foresees arbitration for dispute resolution. This increases the role of the Supervisors decisions and establishes particular and limited steps to follow, as we will see below.

For most parties involved in public procurement tenders in Romania, the provisions of the National Contract on dispute resolution and the new rule of arbitration are perceived as a positive outcome.
Nonetheless, it is remains to be established the functionality of the strict rules and timeframes prescribed, as well as resolutions that will emerge in our practice.

  1. Required steps for a claim & arbitration in a nutshell

The main steps established by the National Contract for the formulation of a claim are comprised in the picture below and described in what follows.

  1. Notice of Claim

 The National Contract indicates the rules applicable in cases of claims formulated by the Contractor and by the Beneficiary.

  1. Claim by the Contractor

– For the claims initiated by the Contractors: A notification must be sent within 30 days of the occurrence of the event or situation (and NOT FROM THE DATE OF HAVING KNOWLEDGE OF such event or situation).

Debates in the interpretations of the consequences of not observing the 30 days’ term have already emerged among practitioners in the field. Among these consequences, if the notification is not sent within 30 days from the occurrence of the event or situation, the Contractor risks that the extension of time is not granted and Additional Cost until the date 30 days prior to the date of notification.

– Within 30 days of the Notice of Claim, the Contractor must present details of the Claim based on daily records, prove the claim and clearly mention the provision on which the claim is based on. 

– If the Supervisor does not approve or agree with the reasons presented or does not answer within 5 days, the Contractor may issue a disagreement notice within 10 days and the provisions regarding Disputes and Arbitration shall apply. Otherwise, the right to receive an extension and / or financial compensation for the event is lost.

  1. Claim by the Beneficiary

When it comes to claims by the Beneficiary, similar provisions are established as for claims by the Contractor.

As a difference, it is indicated that the Beneficiary’s notification will be sent within 30 days from the occurrence of the event, except when it can be demonstrated that the Beneficiary had no knowledge of the event or situation.

  1. Decision of the Supervisor

Following the Notice of Claim, the second stage is a Decision of the Supervisor which implies:

– Admission in principle of the notification of Claim.

– Consultation period.

– Decision of the Supervisor. The elements for which the Parties have not reached an agreement within 15 days from the closure of the Consultation Period, the Supervisor will issue their decision. If the decision is not issued within the aforementioned period, the notice of disagreement can be submitted.

  1. Execution of the Decision of the Supervisor

 Following the Decision of the Supervisor, an implementation phase follows.

Differences emerge in between the implementation of a decision for the Contractors claim and the Beneficiary claim.

  1. For the Contractor Claim – against the Beneficiary no delay damages apply until an arbitration decision in cases of extension of time. Specific rules apply on decisions regarding financial compensation, entitling the Contractor to submit a disagreement notification in case the payment established is not received in a period of 90 days and only the costs established by the Supervisor may be claimed in arbitration.
  2. For the Beneficiary Claim – against the Contractorthe Decision of the Supervisor represents a contractual obligation for each Party until the moment of a review through an amicable solution or arbitration.
  1. Disagreement notice

In order to continue the procedure, a disagreement notice should be submitted indicating the description of the circumstances and elements of disagreement, the motives and the clause based on which is issued. In case the notice of disagreement does not include the required elements, it is null and will not have effects.

After the issuance of a disagreement notice, the provisions regarding Dispute and arbitration comprised in article 70 of the National Contract shall apply.

  1. Dispute 

According to the National Contract, only following the previously mentioned steps within the prescribed time frames, if one Party has sent a disagreement notice to the other, it will be considered that a Dispute has appeared between the Parties.

The parties must try to resolve the dispute amicably either directly or by means of a mediator. Certain periods of time -between 30 to 90 days calculated from the Decision of the Supervisor or after the parties reject the amicable solution/ the date of closure of the amicable settlement procedure –  are established before any party may resort to arbitration.

  1. Arbitration

Finally, after parties may resort to arbitration which shall be carried out according to the rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania.

The arbitrators shall have full authority to access, analyze and review any certificate, decision, and instruction of the Supervisor for the settlement of the dispute.

The Supervisor may be a witness and offer evidence on any matter.

In our practice, the Contractual Agreements for each tender included indications regarding the number of arbitrators, place of arbitration and the language of arbitration. Generally, the place of arbitration was set as Bucharest and the language Romanian, meanwhile a number of 3 arbitrators was set.

Conclusions

The rules set by the National Contract on claims and dispute resolution represent a step forward in public procurement in Romania.  Arbitration is now set as the applicable rule.

Nonetheless, as we have analyzed, the steps established starting with the Notice of claim and continuing with the Decision of the Supervisor and its implementation, the Notice of Disagreement, the emerging of the Dispute and, finally, Arbitration are detailed and strictly regulated with short time frames to be observed.

As such, the positive outcomes brought by the new rules on claims and dispute resolution brought by the National Contract should be analyzed and implemented with attention in order to avoid negative impacts.

We conclude our last article of our series 5 Must-Reads on the National Contract in Public Tenders in Romania by inviting you to visit our previous articles from the series here .

* National Contract refers to the public procurement conditions of contract, as enacted by Government Decision no. 1/2018.

** Words in majuscule have the meaning attributed to them by the conditions of contract, as enacted by Government Decision no. 1/2018.

*** This article is for information purposes only. It is not intended to be used as or substitute legal advice.

[/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Cart

No products in the cart.

Ionut Blidar is a determined and innovative lawyer with ample understanding of the complexities of business law. His expertise ranges from urbanism and construction legal matters, legal title analysis, office and retail leasing, to participating in complex share and asset deals, renewable energy projects and elaborate due diligence exercises. He has assisted local and international clients on a broad spectrum of real estate matters, contributing with valuable due diligence analysis and transactional advice.

He holds a Bachelor's and Master's Degree from the Law Faculty of Babes-Bolyai University.

Anda Delibașa este o avocată dinamică și ambițioasă, specializată în domeniile nuanțate ale achizițiilor publice, dreptului construcțiilor și imobiliarelor. Deține cu mândrie o diplomă de licență de la prestigioasa Facultate de Drept a Universității din București.

Calificată în cadrul Baroului București, Anda abordează fiecare caz cu o atenție meticuloasă la detalii și o dedicare pentru furnizarea de soluții juridice pragmatice și eficiente. Contribuțiile sale se remarcă printr-o înțelegere profundă a legii și un angajament ferm pentru obținerea celor mai bune rezultate pentru clienții noștri.

Răzvan Delibașa este un avocat tânăr și entuziast, axat în principal pe achiziții publice, dreptul construcțiilor și imobiliare. Deține o diplomă de licență de la Facultatea de Drept, Universitatea din București.

Răzvan este membru al Baroului București și a demonstrat abilități de a aborda fiecare caz cu o atenție meticuloasă la detalii și o dedicare neclintită pentru a oferi soluții juridice pragmatice și eficiente.

Cristina deține expertiză în domeniile achizițiilor publice, dreptului construcțiilor și imobiliarelor. De la momentul în care s-a alăturat echipei noastre, contribuțiile ei au fost esențiale în cadrul unor proiecte majore de achiziții publice și energie.

Cristina a absolvit Facultatea de Drept a renumitei Universități din București. În prezent, urmează un master în Arbitraj Internațional, ceea ce îi îmbunătățește și mai mult competențele juridice.

Mânată de o pasiune neclintită pentru domeniul său, Cristina este mereu dedicată să își extindă cunoștințele și să își perfecționeze abilitățile. Această dorință de învățare continuă, împreună cu devotamentul său pentru dezvoltarea profesională, o poziționează ca un practician juridic deosebit de valoros.

Octavian este specializat în litigii civile, comerciale și administrative, care sunt soluționate atât în cadrul sistemului judiciar românesc, cât și în fața tribunalelor arbitrale.

El deține o abilitate remarcabilă de a identifica posibilele puncte slabe în fiecare cale procedurală ce ar putea fi urmată, ghidând astfel selecția celei mai adecvate strategii pentru fiecare dispută specifică, având în permanență un focus clar pe atingerea obiectivelor finale ale clientului.

Înainte de a se alătura echipei S&V, Octavian a practicat avocatura într-una dintre primele firme de avocatură full-service înființate în București și România, reprezentând o gamă largă de clienți, de la corporații mijlocii la mari, până la persoane fizice cu averi substanțiale.

Cazurile recente în care Octavian a fost implicat includ:

▪ reprezentarea unei mari companii naționale de publicitate outdoor în multiple dispute privind (i) îndepărtarea ilegală a panourilor publicitare de către autoritățile publice din București și (ii) suspendarea și anularea unor contracte de închiriere a domeniului public;

▪ acționând în numele unei cunoscute companii offshore, asociată presupus cu o figură proeminentă din politica și afacerile românești, în proceduri de executare împotriva Statului Român și în abordarea contestațiilor la executare;

▪ servind ca membru al echipei care a reprezentat Ministerul Mediului, Apelor și Pădurilor în două dispute ICC la Paris, evaluate la 50 milioane EUR și soluționate la Paris, care au rezultat din privatizarea PETROM S.A.;

▪ reprezentarea unuia dintre cei mai mari retaileri de modă din România în dispute care au apărut din repercusiunile pandemiei COVID-19 asupra contractelor de închiriere a spațiilor din mall-uri.

Andreea a fost implicată într-o gamă largă de dispute legate de urbanism și construcții, inclusiv proceduri de arbitraj, cu privire la aspecte precum execuția contractelor FIDIC și a contractelor de achiziții publice. Experiența sa acoperă, de asemenea, probleme din piața de energie, cum ar fi liberalizarea pieței de energie și reglementările privind energia reactivă.

Mai mult, Andreea a fost direct implicată în litigii privind proiecte majore de infrastructură și construcții și a asistat clienții în toate etapele litigiului. Practica sa în litigii și arbitraj este completată de activitatea sa consultativă pe contractele de achiziții publice, cu un accent pe contractele de construcție.

În plus față de experiența sa în dreptul construcțiilor și al energiei, Andreea este profund interesată de dreptul afacerilor și de diferite chestiuni comerciale, fiind implicată în mai multe proiecte inițiate de Institutul Român de Drept Comercial.

În afara sălii de judecată, Andreea a fost implicată în organizarea mai multor evenimente academice, inclusiv conferințe internaționale și competiții de procese simulate pentru studenții la drept.

Este o persoană extrem de muncitoare și entuziastă, a cărei aspirație este să își extindă continuu cunoștințele teoretice și practice. Dorința sa de a învăța constant lucruri noi, împreună cu devotamentul său de a crește la nivel profesional, o fac extrem de valoroasă.

Andreea a absolvit Facultatea de Drept ca șefă de promoție și deține un master în Arbitraj Internațional de la Universitatea din București.

Ștefan Dudaș are peste zece ani de experiență în soluționarea disputelor internaționale și a practicat avocatura în mai multe jurisdicții europene, inclusiv Franța, Germania, Austria și România, lucrând pentru firme internaționale de avocatură de renume mondial, precum Shearman & Sterling LLP și Derains & Gharavi International, precum și pentru alte firme de avocatură de top din România, cum ar fi NNDKP și Mușat & Asociații.

Și-a concentrat practica pe disputele între investitori și state, precum și pe arbitraje comerciale complexe în sectoarele energiei, infrastructurii, asigurărilor și petrolului și gazelor. A acționat ca avocat în arbitraje în fața ICSID, ICC și UNCITRAL, sub o varietate de legi substanțiale. Cazurile recente în care Ștefan a fost implicat includ:

  • Un arbitraj ICC cu sediul la Paris între un stat din Orientul Mijlociu și o companie asiatică în legătură cu o dispută privind un contract pentru construcția și exploatarea unei instalații de gestionare a deșeurilor solide, în valoare de peste 500 milioane USD;
  • Un arbitraj ICC cu sediul la Paris între o companie din Qatar și unul dintre cei mai mari producători de automobile din lume, cu privire la rezilierea unui acord de distribuție, cu o sumă în dispută de peste 150 milioane USD;
  • O dispută conform Regulilor de Arbitraj SCC privind construcția unei centrale electrice în Libia, în valoare de peste 400 milioane USD;
  • Două arbitraje ICC cu sediul la Paris între una dintre cele mai mari companii energetice italiene și o companie de stat în legătură cu un acord de privatizare care implică modernizarea rețelei naționale de electricitate din România. Suma totală în dispută a fost de peste 1,5 miliarde EUR;
  • O serie de arbitraje ICC cu sediul la Paris între una dintre cele mai mari companii franceze specializate în construcția și întreținerea infrastructurii de transport și o companie de stat, în valoare de peste 125 milioane EUR, privind unele dintre cele mai mari proiecte de infrastructură din România;
  • O dispută privind un tratat de investiții inițiată de un investitor olandez conform Convenției ICSID împotriva României, în legătură cu falimentul uneia dintre cele mai mari companii de asigurări din regiunea CEE, în valoare de 350 milioane EUR;
  • O dispută privind un tratat de investiții între un investitor iranian și Coreea de Sud conform Regulilor de Arbitraj UNCITRAL, în legătură cu privatizarea unei companii de stat, în valoare de peste 500 milioane USD.

Ștefan deține un Masterat în Drept în arbitraj internațional de la Universitatea din Stockholm și își finalizează în prezent un doctorat în drept internațional la Universitatea din Viena.

A publicat numeroase articole și este un lector frecvent în domeniul arbitrajului internațional. Publicațiile recente ale lui Ștefan includ:

  • „Energy Charter Treaty, the Protection of Renewable Energy Investments post Achmea”, în The future of Investment Treaty Arbitration in the EU. Energy Charter Treaty, Intra-EU BITs and Multilateral Investment Court, co-autor, Kluwer International, (în curs de apariție în mai 2020);
  • „Treaty Counterclaims under the ICSID Convention” în ICSID Convention after 50 years: unsettled issues, Kluwer International 2017;
  • „A Sovereign’s Broken Promise: the Golden Ticket to a Billion-Dollar Award?”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 iunie 2016;
  • „Anularea hotărârilor arbitrale în România”, C. Leaua și F. A. Baias eds. Kluwer International, 2016;
  • „Dreptul construcțiilor în România”, Co-autor în Construction Law in Europe, European Society of Construction Law (ESCL) 2016;
  • „O poveste despre promisiuni neîndeplinite și așteptări legitime: Bilcon of Delaware et al. v. Canada”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 11 septembrie 2015.

Roxana Vornicu este recunoscută la nivel național și internațional pentru expertiza sa în achiziții publice, dreptul construcțiilor și dreptul UE, combinând excelența academică cu practica juridică de aproape un deceniu. Ca practician, Roxana este specializată în achiziții publice, dreptul construcțiilor și drept administrativ. A lucrat pentru una dintre cele mai mari firme de avocatură din țară (NNDKP) timp de peste 7 ani, gestionând și lucrând la unele dintre cele mai importante dispute administrative din România. Ea elaborează strategii complexe pentru achiziții publice și litigii administrative și deține cunoștințe cuprinzătoare și o înțelegere profundă a legislației UE în materie de achiziții publice.

Realizările academice ale Roxanei sunt remarcabile. Deține un doctorat Magna Cum Laudae în remedii pentru achiziții publice și este invitată regulat ca vorbitor la universități de elită și conferințe din Europa. Roxana este, de asemenea, cercetător la Centrul pentru Dreptul Construcțiilor și Rezolvarea Disputelor de la King´s College London.

La King´s, Roxana a fost implicată în mai multe programe de cercetare, inclusiv unul care a analizat strategiile de achiziții pentru stimularea livrării colaborative și optimizarea rezultatelor pe termen lung. A contribuit la elaborarea White Paper-ului: „Strategii de Achiziții pentru stimularea livrării colaborative și optimizarea rezultatelor pe termen lung”, dezvoltat de Centrul de Dreptul Construcțiilor de la King’s și Centrul Laing O'Rourke pentru Inginerie și Tehnologie a Construcțiilor de la Universitatea Cambridge și publicat de Centrul pentru Digital Built Britain (CDBB).

Ea a lucrat la raportul: „Procurarea Construcțiilor cu Emisii Net Zero”, care a fost publicat de Society of Construction Law și susținut de Guvernul Marii Britanii în „Construction Playbook” din septembrie 2022 și „Ghidul privind Promovarea Carbonului Net Zero și Sustenabilitatea în Construcții”. Din 2020, Roxana este și lector la Saïd Business School, Universitatea Oxford, unde predă despre tratatele internaționale și impactul lor asupra contractelor de construcții. De asemenea, a predat la Universitatea din Stuttgart, în cadrul cursului International Construction: Practice and Law (MBE), susținând cursuri despre contractele de construcție colaborative.

Listă selectivă de publicații:

  • Vornicu R., P. Gianna, „Pursuing Zero Carbon Targets Through Collaborative Construction Procurement and Contracting”, International Construction Law Review, Partea 4, 2020.
  • Vornicu R., „Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ Procurement Damages in the UK and France – Why So Different?”, European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volumul 14 (2019), Numărul 4, Pagina 222 – 229.
  • Vornicu, R., „Testul încălcării suficient de grave în acțiunile pentru despăgubiri în dreptul achizițiilor publice și povestea a trei instanțe: CJUE, Curtea Supremă a Regatului Unit și Curtea AELS”, în curs de publicare, European Public Law Journal, 2019.
  • Vornicu, R., „Implementarea Directivei Concesiunilor în România”, publicat în Munus Rivista giuridica dei servizi pubblici, vol. 3/2018.
  • Vornicu, R., „Achizițiile publice sub pragurile din Uniunea Europeană: Principii ale dreptului UE și răspunsuri naționale”, EPPPL, (European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review), 187, 2015, coautor cu Dacian Dragoș.
  • Vornicu, R., „Regulile privind executarea contractelor de concesiune în temeiul Directivei Concesiunilor din 2014 și Triunghiul Drepturilor. O scurtă dialectică”, EPPPL 2/2016 (Vol. 11).
  • Vornicu, R., „Răspunderea publică în România”, capitol în Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws, Giacinto della Cananea și Roberto Caranta (eds), Oxford University Press, martie 2021.
  • Vornicu, R., „Comentariu la articolul 58 din Directiva 2014/24/UE în European Public Procurement”, A. Sanchez Graells & R. Caranta (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
  • Vornicu, R., „Comentariu la articolul 63 din Directiva 2014/24/UE în European Public Procurement”, A. Sanchez Graells & R. Caranta (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
  • Vornicu, R., M. Andhov, „O vedere comparativă a utilizării tehnicilor de achiziție și a instrumentelor electronice de către organismele centrale de achiziții”, în Central Purchasing Bodies, M. Comba & C. Risvig (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
  • Vornicu, R., „Organisme centrale de achiziții în România”, Central Purchasing Bodies, M. Comba & C. Risvig (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, coautor cu Dacian C. Dragoș.
  • Roxana VORNICU, „Tendințe și Dezvoltări în Dreptul Administrativ Românesc”, în Jean-Bernard Auby (ed), LE FUTUR DU DROIT ADMINISTRATIF / THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, Lexis Nexis 2019, pp. 151-158, coautor cu Dacian C. Dragoș.
  • „BIM și sustenabilitatea”, capitol în Sustainability Through Public Procurement: The Way Forward – Reform Proposals, Sustainability Through Public Procurement: The Way Forward – Reform Proposals, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020-09 SMART Project Report.
  • R Vornicu, „Legea 98/2016 privind achizițiile publice comentată”, Wolters Kluwer Online, coautor Dacian Dragoș.
  • R Vornicu „Concesiunile și PPP în România”, în Piotr Bogdanowicz, Roberto Caranta, Pedro Telles (eds), Public-Private Partnerships and Concessions in the EU, Edward Elgar 2020, coautor Dacian Dragoș.
  • „Tendințe și Dezvoltări în Dreptul Administrativ Românesc”, în Jean-Bernard Auby (ed) LE FUTUR DU DROIT ADMINISTRATIF / THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, Lexis Nexis 2019, coautor Dacian Dragoș.

Georgiana Sîrbu a practicat dreptul la una dintre cele mai mari firme de avocatură din București, NNDKP. Ulterior, a fost la conducerea departamentului juridic al gigantului internațional în energie AstroEnergy, parte a Chint Group, care are o prezență în peste 140 de țări și mai mult de 30.000 de angajați. Ca Șef al Departamentului Juridic în Spania, a fost responsabilă de gestionarea juridică a peste 15 birouri din Spania, România, Chile, Mexic și Brazilia.

Georgiana deține diplome în drept și economie și un master în dreptul afacerilor. A predat la Universitatea Pompeu Fabra din Barcelona – o universitate de renume mondial, clasată printre cele mai bune din Spania, unde a fost implicată în grupuri de cercetare juridică de renume internațional.

Este apreciată pentru abilitatea sa de a înțelege și empatiza cu interesele de afaceri ale clienților săi și pentru strategiile sale juridice orientate spre rezultate, precum și pentru cunoștințele sale în achiziții publice, imobiliare și energie.

Anda Delibașa is a dynamic and ambitious young attorney, with a specialized focus in the nuanced fields of public procurement, construction law, and real estate. She proudly holds a Bachelor's Degree from the prestigious Faculty of Law at the University of Bucharest.

Qualified with the Bucharest Bar, Anda approaches each case with meticulous attention to detail and a dedication to providing pragmatic and effective legal solutions. Her contributions are characterized by a keen understanding of the law and a commitment to achieving the best outcomes for our clients.

Razvan Delibasa is a young, enthusiastic lawyer whose primary focus is public procurement, construction law, and real estate. He holds a Bachelor's Degree from Faculty of Law, University of Bucharest.

Razvan has qualified with the Bucharest Bar and has shown abilities to approach each case with meticulous attention to detail and an unwavering dedication to delivering pragmatic and effective legal solutions.

Octavian specializes in civil, commercial, and administrative disputes, which are addressed both within the Romanian court system and before arbitral tribunals.

He possesses a discerning ability to identify potential weaknesses in each procedural path that could be pursued, ultimately guiding the selection of the most appropriate strategy for each specific dispute, all while keeping a sharp focus on achieving the client's ultimate objectives.

Before joining S&V, Octavian practiced law at one of the first full service law firms to be established in Bucharest and Romania, representing a wide-range of clients, from midsize to large corporations, as well ass private high net worth individuals.

Recent cases in which Octavian was has been engaged in comprise:

▪ representing a major domestic outdoor advertising company in multiple disputes concerning (i) illegal removal of billboards by Bucharest public authorities and (ii) suspending and annulling a public domain rental agreements;

▪ acting on behalf of a notorious offshore company, purportedly associated with a prominent Romanian political and business figure, in enforcement proceedings against the Romanian State and in addressing challenges to enforcement;

▪ serving as a member team representing the Ministry of Environment, Water and Forests in two ICC Paris disputes, valued at EUR 50M and seated in Paris, arising from the privatisation of PETROM S.A.

▪ representing one of Romania's largest fashion retailers in disputes arising from the repercutions of the COVID-19 pandemic on rental agreements associated with mall spaces;

Cristina possesses expertise in the domains of public procurement, construction law, and real estate. Since becoming a part of our team, her contributions have been pivotal to major public procurement and energy ventures.

Cristina's educational background includes graduating from the Faculty of Law at the esteemed University of Bucharest. Currently, she is pursuing a master's degree in International Arbitration, further enhancing her legal acumen.

Driven by an unwavering passion for her field, Cristina is perpetually committed to broadening her knowledge and refining her skills. This fervor for continuous learning, coupled with her resolute dedication to professional advancement, positions her as an exceptionally valuable legal practitioner.

Alexandra is an alumna of the University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law, and currently contributes her expertise to the dispute resolution and arbitration department at Sirbu & Vornicu Law. Her primary specializations encompass public procurement, construction law, and administrative law.

Alexandra excels in collaborative environments, readily engaging with her colleagues to foster the exchange of opinions and ideas. This approach consistently leads to the identification of the most efficient and advantageous working methods.

Fuelled by a fervent aspiration to translate her accumulated knowledge into practical outcomes, Alexandra is characterized by her unwavering dedication. Her commitment manifests in her wholehearted support of our clients, ensuring the provision of optimal solutions.

Andreea has been involved in a broad range of urbanism and construction disputes including arbitration proceedings, regarding matters such as the execution of FIDIC and public procurement contracts. Her experience also covers energy market issues, such as the energy market liberalization and reactive energy regulations.

Moreover, Andreea has been directly involved in disputes regarding major infrastructure and construction projects and has assisted clients in all stages of litigation. Her litigation and arbitration practices are completed by her advisory work on procurement contracts with a focus on construction contracts.

In addition to her experience in construction and energy law, Andreea is keenly interested in business law and different commercial matters, being involved in several projects initiated by the Romanian Institute of Commercial Law.

Outside of the courtroom, Andreea has been involved in the organizations of several academic events, including international conferences and mock trials competition for law students.

She is a very hard working and enthusiastic individual whose aspiration is to continuously broaden her theoretical and practical knowledge. Her eagerness to constantly learn new matters along with her devotion to grow on a professional level make her highly valuable.

Andreea has graduated Law School as a valedictorian and has a master’s degree in International Arbitration from the University of Bucharest.

Stefan Dudas has over ten years of experience in international dispute settlement and has practiced law in several European jurisdictions, including France, Germany, Austria and Romania while working for world-renowned international law firms, such as Shearman & Sterling LLP and Derains & Gharavi International, and other market leading law firms in Romania, such as NNDKP and Musat & Associates.

He focuses his practice on investor-State disputes, as well as complex commercial arbitrations in the energy, infrastructure, insurance, and oil and gas sectors.  He has acted as counsel in arbitrations before ICSID, ICC and UNCITRAL under a variety of substantive laws. Recent cases in which Stefan acted include:

An ICC arbitration seated in Paris between a Middle Eastern State and an Asian company in relation to a dispute arising out of a contract for the construction and exploitation of a solid waste management facility valued at over USD 500 million;

An ICC arbitration seated in Paris between a Qatari company and the largest car manufacturers in the world over the termination of a distribution agreement, with an amount in dispute over USD 150 million;

A dispute under the SCC Arbitration Rules concerning the construction of a power plant in Libya valued at over USD 400 million;

Two ICC arbitrations seated in Paris between one of the largest Italian power company and a State-owned company in relation to a privatization agreement entailing the modernization of the national power grid in Romania. The total amount in dispute was over EUR 1.5 billion;

A series of ICC arbitrations seated in Paris between one of the largest French companies specialized in construction and maintenance of transport infrastructure and a State-owned company, valued at over EUR 125 million concerning some of the largest infrastructure projects in Romania;

An investment treaty dispute initiated by a Dutch investor under the ICSID Convention against Romania in relation to bankruptcy of one of the largest insurance companies in the CEE region valued at EUR 350 million;

An investment treaty dispute between an Iranian investor and South Korea under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in relation to the privatization of a State-owned company valued at over USD 500 million.

Stefan holds a Master of Laws in international arbitration from Stockholm University and is currently finalizing a Ph.D. in international law at the University of Vienna.

He has authored numerous articles and is a frequent lecturer in international arbitration. Stefan’s recent publications include:

“Energy Charter Treaty, the Protection of Renewable Energy Investments post Achmea”, in The future of Investment Treaty Arbitration in the EU. Energy Charter Treaty, Intra-EU BITs and Multilateral Investment Court, co-author, Kluwer International, (upcoming in May 2020);

“Treaty Counterclaims under the ICSID Convention” in ICSID Convention after 50 years: unsettled issues, Kluwer International 2017;

“A Sovereign’s Broken Promise: the Golden Ticket to a Billion-Dollar Award?”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, June 21, 2016;

“Annulment of awards in Arbitration in Romania”, C. Leaua and F. A. Baias eds. Kluwer International, 2016;

“Construction law in Romania”, Co-author in Construction Law in Europe, European Society of Construction Law (ESCL) 2016;

“A story about broken promises and legitimate expectations: Bilcon of Delaware et al. v. Canada”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 11 September 2015.

Roxana Vornicu is recognized nationally and internationally for her public procurement, construction law and EU law expertise and she combines academic excellence with legal practice for almost a decade. As a practitioner, Roxana specializes in procurement, construction and administrative law. She has worked for one of the biggest law firm in the country (NNDKP) for over 7 years, managing and working in some of the highest profile administrative disputes of Romania. She handles complex strategies for procurement and administrative disputes and holds comprehensive knowledge and thorough understanding of EU procurement law.
Her academic accomplishments are stellar. She holds a Magna Cum Laudae PhD in procurement remedies and is regularly invited as a speaker to elite universities and conferences in Europe. Roxana is also a researcher at the King´s College London Centre of Construction law and Dispute Resolution in London.
At King´s, Roxana has been involved in several research programs, including one that looked into procurement strategies for incentivising collaborative delivery to optimise whole-life outcomes. She contributed to the drafting of the White Paper: 'Procurement Strategies for incentivising collaborative delivery to optimize whole-life outcomes’ developed by King’s Centre of Construction Law and the University of Cambridge Laing O'Rourke Centre for Construction Engineering and Technology and published by the Centre for Digital Built Britain (CDBB).

She worked on the report: 'Procuring Net Zero Construction' which was published by the Society of Construction Law and endorsed by the UK Government in the September 2022 ´Construction Playbook´ and ´Guidance on Promoting Net Zero Carbon and Sustainability in Construction.'
Since 2020, Roxana has been also a lecturer at Saïd Business School, Oxford University, teaching about international treaties and their impact on construction contracts. She has also taught at Stuttgart University, the International Construction: Practice and Law (MBE) course, lecturing on collaborative construction contracts.
Selective list of Publications:
• Vornicu R., P. Gianna, ´Pursuing Zero Carbon Targets Through Collaborative Construction Procurement and Contracting ´, International Construction Law Review, Part 4, 2020.

• Vornicu R., ´Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ Procurement Damages in the UK and France – Why So Different? ´, European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 14 (2019), Issue 4, Page 222 – 229

• Vornicu, R., The sufficiently serious breach test in Action for Damages in Public Procurement Law and a tale of three courts: The CJEU, The UK Supreme Court and the EFTA court, in press, European Public Law Journal, 2019.

• Vornicu, R., ‘The implementation of the Concession Directive in Romania’, published with Munus Rivista giuridica dei servizi pubblici, vol. 3/2018.

• Vornicu, R., Public Procurement below thresholds in the European Union: EU law Principles and national responses, EPPPL, (European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review), 187, 2015, Co-authored with Dacian Dragos

• Vornicu, R., (2016), The rules on Performance of the Concession Contracts under the 2014 Concession Directive and the Triangle of Rights. A brief Dialectic, EPPPL 2/2016 (Vol. 11)

• Vornicu, R., Public liability in Romania, chapter in Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws, Giacinto della Cananea and Roberto Caranta (eds), Oxford University Press, March 2021

• Vornicu, R., Commentary of Article 58 of Directive 2014/24/EU in European Public Procurement, A. Sanchez Graells & R. Caranta (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021

• Vornicu, R., Commentary of Article 63 of Directive 2014/24/EU in European Public Procurement, A. Sanchez Graells & R. Caranta (eds), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021

• Vornicu, R., M. Andhov, ´A comparative view of the use of procurement techniques and electronic instruments by central purchasing bodies´, in Central Purchasing Bodies, M. Comba & C. Risvig (eds) Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.

• Vornicu, R., , Central Purchasing Bodies in Romania, Central Purchasing Bodies, M. Comba & C. Risvig (eds) Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, co-authored with Dacian C. Dragos.

• Roxana VORNICU, Tendencies and Developments in Romanian Administrative Law, in Jean-Bernard Auby (ed) LE FUTUR DU DROIT ADMINISTRATIF / THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, Lexis Nexis 2019, pp. 151-158, co-authored with Dacian C. Dragos

• BIM and sustainability, chapter in Sustainability Through Public Procurement: The Way Forward – Reform Proposals, Sustainability Through Public Procurement: The Way Forward – Reform Proposals University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020-09 SMART Project Report

• R Vornicu, ´Legea 98/2016 privind achizițiile publice comentata´ Wolters Kluwer Online, Co-author Dacian Dragos.

• R Vornicu ´Concessions and PPP in Romania´, in Piotr Bogdanowicz, Roberto Caranta, Pedro Telles (eds), Public-Private Partnerships and Concessions in the EU, Edward Elgar 2020, Co-author Dacian Dragos.
nia´, in a collective volume published with Oxford University Press edited by Giacinto della Cananea & Roberto Caranta (in press).

Georgiana Sirbu practiced law at one of the biggest law firms in Bucharest, NNDKP. Following this, she was at the helm of the legal department of international energy giant AstroEnergy, part of the Chint Group with a presence in over 140 countries with more than 30,000 employees. As Head of Legal in Spain, she was in driving seat for the legal management of more than 15 offices in Spain, Romania, Chile, Mexico and Brazil.

Georgiana holds degrees in law and economics and a master’s degree in business law. She has taught at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona – a world-leading university ranked amongst the best universities in Spain where she has been involved in internationally renowned legal research groups.

She is valued for her ability to truly understand and empathize with her clients’ business interests and for her results-driven legal strategies and knowledge of public procurement, real estate and energy.